[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]

Re: SimpleList test fails with beta 0.92



Ross McFarland wrote:
> my other question would be if the old stuff is still laying around on
> the system. by old stuff i either mean older versions of gtk2-perl-xs or
> gtk2-perl. there are no GType.pm, Widget.pm, Container.pm modules in
> gtk2-perl-xs, i guess there must be in gtk2-perl why it would be looking
> for it at that point i don't know. the two won't co-exist with out
> taking special care.

The answer is yes: I didn't uninstall the Inline stuff, and I didn't uninstall
the previous versions of gtk2-perl-xs... Is there a safe way to uninstall them?
And is it the right way, uninstalling them before a new version is out?

I've been using Gtk2-Perl for a few months now, without any problems due to Inline
and XS coexisting, so I didn't think that was a problem.

To be honest, I don't really care if the tests fail as long as the package itself
works properly. I didn't try the SimpleList though...

If you point me out to an example I should run to verify SimpleList works fine,
I'll try it. There were a couple of examples on this list recently, would they be
conclusive?

> we really need to put something in the README/INSTALL files about going
> from the inline version to the new stuff. we also need to mention the
> issues, whatever they may be, about installing it on mandrake systems.
> i'd put it all in myself, but i don't know the exact issues and what to
> say about them.

I've followed every release of Gtk2-Perl since the Inline stuff, but it seems
all other tests pass, it's only SimpleList that fails.

On my Solaris machine, I use to have problems with CodeGen.pm (grep failed, only 
a matter of quotes), but that was fixed by muppet a few releses ago (thanks!).

> it sure looks my first idea is the problem, but if not do you have the
> latest Glib package? 

Yes, I have version 0.92 of Glib too. As you said, it's probably the Inline stuff.
I'd try removing that, but what's a clean way to do it?

Thanks,
Tudor




[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]