Re: [xslt] Isn't it time to make libxslt multi-threaded?

On Fri, 2012-07-27 at 14:08 -0400, Phil Shafer wrote:
> Liam R E Quin writes:
> >
> >mentions one timing that was done, but it's not with your data :-)
> Has anyone run xsltmark (or any serious set of data) on recent
> versions of xslt processors?

Not I, although one would probably want to recast the benchmarks to use
XSLT 2 (and soon XSLT 3) features and idioms if the goal was to compare
recent XSLT processors. At least two of these operate on (XML) databases
rather than on files, as I understand it, which might complicate things.


Liam Quin - XML Activity Lead, W3C,
Pictures from old books:

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]