Re: libxml2 regression test, Was: Re: [xslt] Nodeset in extensions

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Mon, Jan 12, 2004 at 11:59:19AM +0100, Peter Breitenlohner wrote:
> In the regression tests for libxslt there used to be lots of more or less
> suspicious differences, but they have disappeared with libxslt-1.1.0.
> For libxlm2 (2.6.4) there are, however, two suspicious differences left.
> Attached the relevant fragment of the output resulting from 'make check'.
> 
> Any comments?

  just that the DocBook test instance reference the DocBook DTD and you don't
have it in your system catalogs. You can ignore this.

> One more question: 'make check' outside the source tree (i.e. with VPATH)
> didn't work so well, which caused me to do the build in a symlinked tree
> (created with X11's lndir). Has this situation changed?

  I don't know, I never test this way.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard@redhat.com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/