Re: [xml] [PATCH] Doc: do not mislead towards "infeasible" scenario wrt. xmlBufNodeDump

On 11/07/19 20:00 +0200, Jan Pokorný wrote:
I've run into a source of frustration based on an unset advice
in the documentation that I hope to remove with this change.
Or did I overlook something?  Thanks for pulling otherwise!

(Indeed, there could be substantially bigger cut, like possibly
retargeting xmlBufCreate as public, etc. but no wonders if there's
not much will for that once the status quo lasted so long...)

Also submitted as a merge request for more persistent tracking
and possible discussion:

(As an aside, RelaxNG seems not to be in shape when any advanced
grammar constructs are present, i.e., not just a matter of performance
but rather the correctness of validation:

Jan (Poki)

Attachment: pgpPAvYqtdf3h.pgp
Description: PGP signature

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]