Re: [xml] MIT License question

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

   Hi,

  It seems to me most companies (smartphones, car entertainment systems,...)
just pick the libxml2 and libxslt licances for display as coming from the
distributions. But I am not a lawyer, and this is not a legal advice, check
your lawyers for a real answer, and considering your business I'm sure
you have tons of those :-(

Daniel

On Mon, Aug 07, 2017 at 01:02:19PM -0700, Brad Wait wrote:
> Hi,
>
> Our product uses libxml2 and these components:
>
>    - sort
>    - trio
>    - xslt
>
>
> Is it sufficient to include the main libxml2 MIT License (with its various
> copyright owners etc).to cover each of these components?  Or, are there
> separate licenses for each? If the latter, where can I find these?
>
> Thanks
> Brad

> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml gnome org
> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml


-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Developers Tools http://developer.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/