Re: [xml] xmlHashAddEntry/xmlHashScan behaviour
- From: Nikolay Sivov <bunglehead gmail com>
- To: veillard redhat com
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] xmlHashAddEntry/xmlHashScan behaviour
- Date: Wed, 31 Oct 2012 09:22:17 +0300
On 10/31/2012 08:09, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 08:45:35AM +0300, Nikolay Sivov wrote:
Hi,
Got a question on libxml2 hash implementation.
Let's say I want to have index access to hash data, so I call
xmlHashAddEntry for item1
xmlHashAddEntry for item2
xmlHashAddEntry for item3
Is it wrong assumption to expect xmlHashScan calling back exactly in
same order as I added these entries?
It is a wrong assumption. You can't expect any specific
order back from xmlHashScan() callbacks.
Ok, thanks. I'll workaround that then. Btw, is it possible recently
added hash randomization made
this "more" visible? I mean I was lucky enough it seems that a very
limited test case (of two entries, well I know),
worked with older version and now it fails from time to time.
Daniel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]