Re: [xml] cleanup on randomization - inconsistent in master

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 06:55:25PM +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote:
[...]
> The libxml regression tests pass on x86_64, linux , glibc :

  That's my platform, yeah "make check" should look fine !

> Ran 2269 tests, 15 errors, 0 leaks
> Total 2269 tests, 15 errors, 0 leaks
> See runxmlconf.log for detailed output
> 15 errors were expected
> .....

  Looks normal !

> On same platform libxlst tests (source from master) with libxml2
> (current master) report following:
> ..........
> ## Running REC tests
> test-7.1.1-3 result
> 2c2 < <out>SUCCESS</out> --- > <out
> xmlns:doc="http://example.org/doc";>SUCCESS</out>
> ## Running REC tests without dictionaries
> test-7.1.1-3 result
> 2c2 < <out>SUCCESS</out> --- > <out
> xmlns:doc="http://example.org/doc";>SUCCESS</out>
> ..........
>
> Is above regression is libxml2 or libxslt test results are not updated ?

  It had been that way for ages, so I would not call this a regression
at this point :-)

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | libxml Gnome XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
daniel veillard com  | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
http://veillard.com/ | virtualization library  http://libvirt.org/