Re: [xml] cleanup on randomization - inconsistent in master

[Roumen Petrov <bugtrack roumenpetrov info>]

Hi Daniel,


Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Sun, May 20, 2012 at 11:28:05AM +0300, Roumen Petrov wrote:
> > Oops,
[SNIP]
> > So only check for rand_r is missing in configure script.
>    Right I forgot to push that chunk because I have another change
> there to bump to 2.8.0 ... oops, I'm fixing that :-)
>
>     thanks !
Thanks

The libxml regression tests pass on x86_64, linux , glibc :
....
Ran 2269 tests, 15 errors, 0 leaks
Total 2269 tests, 15 errors, 0 leaks
See runxmlconf.log for detailed output
15 errors were expected
.....


On same platform libxlst tests (source from master) with libxml2 
(current master) report following:
..........
## Running REC tests
test-7.1.1-3 result
2c2 < <out>SUCCESS</out> --- > <out 
xmlns:doc="http://example.org/doc";>SUCCESS</out>
## Running REC tests without dictionaries
test-7.1.1-3 result
2c2 < <out>SUCCESS</out> --- > <out 
xmlns:doc="http://example.org/doc";>SUCCESS</out>
..........

Is above regression is libxml2 or libxslt test results are not updated ?

> Daniel

Roumen