Re: [xml] xml Digest, Vol 89, Issue 16
- From: Glen Hein <ghein azcoppersoft com>
- To: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] xml Digest, Vol 89, Issue 16
- Date: Sun, 25 Sep 2011 16:01:27 -0700
On Sun, 2011-09-25 at 15:20 -0700, Alan Hogan wrote:
Sounds like a cop-out.
1. What is the point of parsing HTML if it is treated like dumb XML without an intelligent spec-aware layer on top of that (at least optionally)?
2. What alternative do people have to libXML if they want to generate a “real” DOM from HTML?
3. Why document an “HTML” mode if it isn’t really parsing HTML? Per HTML, there really ought to be a TBODY node, no ifs, ands, or buts.
Wow. You sound like an ass.
In case you didn't notice, libxml is free open-source software. If you don't like its feature set, then:
1) Politely ask for someone to add the features you need.
2) Add the features yourself.
3) Start a new project from the ground up.
4) Find some other project that does what you want.
5) Go pound sand.
For you, I recommend #5.
] [Thread Prev