Re: [xml] Most portable xml library?
- From: richardcavell mail com
- To: derhoermi gmx net
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] Most portable xml library?
- Date: Sat, 09 Apr 2011 19:32:48 -0400
It seems unlikely to me that you have implemented a fully conforming
XML
processor yet would describe it as implemented "with <string.h>".
It's not fully conforming. It does the minimum amount of work to
extract the information needed, and ignores the rest of the document.
Richard
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
