Re: [xml] FW: LibXml2-2.6-32 : Canonical XML implementation test program

[Aleksey Sanin <aleksey aleksey com>]

Sorry for delay with the reply. I just got back from vacation...

Your xpath is incorrect, try to use "ancestor-or-self::ns1:Operation"
instead.

Best,
Aleksey


Andrew Hartley wrote:
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> Really sorry to have bothered you with this.  I should have spotted that 
> the XML file from which I was extracting the data was at fault.  After I 
> sent the emails earlier, I spotted the console window reporting xmlns 
> errors.
>
>  
>
> Sorry.
>
>  
>
> Best regards,
>
> Andy
>
>  
>
> *From:* Andrew Hartley [mailto:andrew hartley bcs org uk]
> *Sent:* 05 July 2008 17:47
> *To:* 'aleksey aleksey com'
> *Subject:* FW: LibXml2-2.6-32 : Canonical XML implementation test program
>
>  
>
> Sorry, I forgot to attaché the files.
>
>  
>
> Andy
>
>  
>
> *From:* Andrew Hartley [mailto:andrew hartley bcs org uk]
> *Sent:* 05 July 2008 17:46
> *To:* 'aleksey aleksey com'
> *Subject:* LibXml2-2.6-32 : Canonical XML implementation test program
>
>  
>
> Hi,
>
>  
>
> I hope you don’t mind me contacting you.   I would appreciate if you 
> could let me have a reply to the question below.
>
>  
>
>  I have been using your LibXml2 library, thanks for writing this.
>
>  
>
> I am running your Canonical XML implementation test program and with the 
> above version of the library.  I am using the following argument list 
> (and enclose the files herewith):
>
>  
>
> --exc-without-comments d:\temp\ros.xml d:\temp\MyXpathDoc.xml soapenv
>
>  
>
> All is working fine until I reach:
>
>  
>
> ret = xmlC14NDocDumpMemory(doc,
>
>             (xpath) ? xpath->nodesetval : NULL,
>
>             exclusive, inclusive_namespaces,
>
>             with_comments, &result);
>
>  
>
> The xmlC14NDocDumpMemory return -1 and the result is still NULL.   I am 
> running Visual Studio 2005, and Vista Home Premium with UAC switched off.
>
>  
>
> Can you think of any reason as to why this is failing.  I don’t have the 
> source for LibXml2, otherwise I could run the source and check.
>
>  
>
>