Re: [xml] what should to be 'const'?

[massimo morara <m morara 3di it>]

On Mon, May 21, 2007 at 11:00:45AM -0700, Rush Manbert wrote:
> I thought that "const xmlNodePtr node" meant the same 
> thing as "const xmlNode * node", as if xmlNodePtr were a macro 
> definition that expanded to "xmlNode *", but the typedef changes things,

        Right. You caught the point: macros and typedefs are different 
things.
        I think this is one of the less documented things of C/C++.

 
> You are correct and I have learned something.
        
        Happy to be useful.


> If what you are asking for is the 
> intent, then Daniel will need to answer.

        I agree: waiting Daniel for a authentic interpretation.

                massimo morara
-- 

"The glass is neither half empty nor half full. It is twice as large as
 it needs to be."
-- unknown