Re: [xml] getElementsByName is available?
- From: Stefan Behnel <stefan_ml behnel de>
- To: s kalyanasundaram gmail com
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] getElementsByName is available?
- Date: Thu, 28 Jun 2007 13:42:16 +0200
kalyanasundaram wrote:
So which would be better? XPath or linear traversing?
I dont know much about XPath implementation. (Do they not traverse
atleast once?) The file size is about 500 KB. :)
That sounds rather small. Just parse it in and walk through it, that's what
I'd do.
Really! I thought 500 Kb is bigger. How much it would be able to handle?
At what size I should go for XPath ?
The question is not "at what size". The question is: "what's the overhead
involved in both cases in terms of speed and programming".
If the XPath API is easy to use for you, go with it. But a custom tree walker
can still be faster if you need it (and have the time to implement and
optimise it). In lxml (the best Python bindings for libxml2/libxslt :), we use
a pretty fast tree walker macro. See the end of
http://codespeak.net/svn/lxml/trunk/src/lxml/etree_defs.h
(BSD-licensed, BTW)
Stefan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]