Re: [xml] modifying tree and attributes

[Rob Richards <rrichards ctindustries net>]

Daniel Veillard wrote:

>  Maybe addchild should be fixed too. We have hopefully reasonably complete
> reconciliate routines for people doing cut and past of tree fragments between
> document and locations, being more resilient and pointing users with potential
> trouble to that routine sounds the right approach at this point.
>  
Left addchild as is for now as it works fine and unlink is easy enough 
to call from outside. Probably some additional documentation may help in 
some of these cases. Those just generated through the comments?

>  Yeah, but the bindings shifted my concerns a bit, at the time breaking
> a bit the behaviour of a custom application was what I really feared. Now
> what I would really fear is a segfault leading to an exploit in PHP or 
> other web based front-end bindings.
>  
Thanks, makes things a bit more clear to me now.

Rob