Re: [xml] c14n

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:06:36AM -0800, Aleksey Sanin wrote:
> > > either way, it would be nice if the error reported explained the problem
> > > a bit better.
> >
> >
> >  that I agree with,
> Currently, all c14n errors are ifdef'd with DEBUG_C14N. Should
> we just turn them on by default?

  Depends:
     1/ do they use the existing structured error reporting framework ?
        I think so but double checking quickly would be good
     2/ is there any drawback for example speed wise ?
     3/ would that be a problem for upper layer like xmldsig ?

In general people appreciate receiving error messages when stuff fails.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/