Re: [xml] c14n

On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 09:06:36AM -0800, Aleksey Sanin wrote:
either way, it would be nice if the error reported explained the problem
a bit better.

 that I agree with,

Currently, all c14n errors are ifdef'd with DEBUG_C14N. Should
we just turn them on by default?

     1/ do they use the existing structured error reporting framework ?
        I think so but double checking quickly would be good
     2/ is there any drawback for example speed wise ?
     3/ would that be a problem for upper layer like xmldsig ?

In general people appreciate receiving error messages when stuff fails.


Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Desktop team
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit | Rpmfind RPM search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]