Re: [xml] Re: xsd:include question

[Kasimier Buchcik <kbuchcik 4commerce de>]

Hi,

> agantuk B wrote:
>
> > Thanks for your response. I'll send you a test case
> > shortly.

Can you still send a test case? We made some changes to the inclusion
mechanism (CVS xmlschemas.c rev 1.114), which should take care of your
problem.

Regards,

Kasimier

[...]
> > agantuk B wrote:
> >
> >         Hi.. i've a newbie question...
> >
> >         I've a basic question on includes. I've 3
> > files - base.xsd, one.xsd, two.xsd.
> >
> > base.xsd defines some element names (of type
> > simpletypes, & complex types).
> > one.xsd, two.xsd refer to the element names in
> > base.xsd, and add additional elements.
> >
> >
> > two.xsd includes base.xsd
> > one.xsd includes base.xsd
> > one.xsd also includes two.xsd
> >
> >
> > one.xsd:
> > ....
> > <xsd:include schemaLocation="base.xsd"/>
> > ....
> >
> >
> > two.xsd:
> > ...
> > <xsd:include schemaLocation="base.xsd"/>
> > <xsd:include schemaLocation="one.xsd"/>
> > ....
> >
> >
> > Should the schema parser complain about multiple
> > element names ?  with libxml (testSchema) it does,
> > with some others it doesn't !
> >
> >
> > No, it shoudn't complain. I guess you hit the
> > non-complete
> > implementation of the <include> mechanism. Could you
> > send a
> > reproduceable test case, i.e. an instance and the XSD
> > files? Is the