Re: [xml] libxml2-2.6.22 tests
- From: Kasimier Buchcik <K Buchcik 4commerce de>
- To: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- Cc: ML-libxml2 <xml gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xml] libxml2-2.6.22 tests
- Date: Fri, 09 Dec 2005 11:05:59 +0100
Hi,
On Fri, 2005-12-09 at 04:29 -0500, Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Thu, Dec 08, 2005 at 03:44:14PM -0800, Manish Marathe wrote:
Hello,
If I run libxml2-2.6.22 tests by two different ways
1 way:
./runtest
./runsuite
./testapi
a) 546 errors for Microsoft schema tests
b) 27 errors for Sun schema tests
2) way:
make tests / make check
a) 558 errors for Microsoft schema tests
b) 38 failures and not errors for Sun schema tests
Why is the number of errors for MS and SUN schema tests different in
both ways.
because it's not the same exact testing code.
'make tests' uses the Python test runner for the XML Schema test
suite; it's in xstc/xstc.py.
The difference is that the Python code will mark an _instance_ test as
failed if the _schema_ was already evaluated to be invalid. On the other
hand runsuite.c tries to validate the instance using XSI if the schema
was invalid.
Although the total number of tests ran for each of the schema
tests were same in both the cases, which are: 7230 for MS and 193 for
SUN
Having that said which is the right way to execute tests?
depends what you're trying to do and your platform.
True.
However, I changed runsuite.c to eliminate the difference. You get
equal results from both sides now: runsuite.c revision 1.14.
Regards,
Kasimier
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]