Re: [xml] XHTML Doc serialization and meta element
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Rob Richards <rrichards ctindustries net>
- Cc: "xml gnome org" <xml gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xml] XHTML Doc serialization and meta element
- Date: Wed, 24 Aug 2005 08:55:02 -0400
On Wed, Aug 24, 2005 at 08:50:08AM -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
The following document is manually built via the API (this is why the
double free as the meta element is created and not being freed until
after the doc was serailized - but was already freed from the
serialization) then xmlDocDumpFormatMemory is called:
You keep an handle to the meta element while it was already inserted in
the tree ?
Origional doc that was built:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="application/xhtml+xml;
charset=UTF-8" />
<title></title>
</head>
</html>
Results of output - excluding the crash part :):
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD XHTML 1.0 Strict//EN"
"http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/DTD/xhtml1-strict.dtd">
<html xmlns="http://www.w3.org/1999/xhtml">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=UTF-8" />
<title></title>
</head>
</html>
htmlSetMetaEncoding creates a new meta element and kills the old one.
[...]
I wouldnt mind having to check if doc is xhtml and then calling
htmlGetMetaEncoding. If no encoding the app could then handle the issue
ints it own fashion and then set the format flag appropriately for the
output function.
Just an idea unless someone has any other ways this might be handled.
Another way would be to make libxml2 not touch anything if it detects
any http-equiv meta tag, and if it doesn't detect one try to put the
tag serialization in the output buffer, but not in the tree itself.
This would requires some tweaking of the serialization code but should
not be too hard. This would be more satisfactory from an API POV since
serialization would not modify the input tree, and would not disturb
headers if the application is already taking care of it, while still
adding the meta if the application is ignorant about it.
What do you think ?
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Desktop team http://redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]