Re: [xml] memory usage question

[Kasimier Buchcik <kbuchcik 4commerce de>]

Hi,

On Wed, 2005-08-17 at 10:08 -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 17, 2005 at 10:04:08AM -0400, Rob Richards wrote:
> > Daniel Veillard wrote:
> >
> > > Ho ho ... if it's really the same document on both side there is something
> > > fishy, I can't think of anything leading to this, seems it's twice the size
> > > on Linux, and I really can't see why. I would be very interested in 
> > > feedback
> > > on this, it may be a stupid accounting error in xmlmemory.c, or a real bug
> > > which in that case sounds quite serious.
> > GD!!! It was using the wrong file there. The other file (damn typo) was 
> > 2X the size which caused this.
> > real numbers look correct.
>
>   Damn, I was hoping for a cheap 2x memory usage optimization on Linux !
> How disapointing :-)

Oops, so I can burry my started test already :-)

Greetings,

Kasimier