[xml] Re: [sigc] spec file and include path name
- From: Murray Cumming <murrayc murrayc com>
- To: Carl Nygard <cjnygard verizon net>
- Cc: libxml-list <xml gnome org>
- Subject: [xml] Re: [sigc] spec file and include path name
- Date: Sat, 30 Apr 2005 12:04:35 +0200
On Fri, 2005-04-29 at 17:38 -0400, Carl Nygard wrote:
I just downloaded 2.10, and I'm seeing a discrepancy between make
install and what the spec file is expecting.
lib version is 2.10
make install tries to put includes in:
test -z "/usr/local/include/libxml++-2.6/libxml++/parsers" || mkdir -p --
"/usr/local/include/libxml++-2.6/libxml++/parsers"
spec file is:
%files devel
%defattr(-,root,root)
/usr/include/libxml++-2.8
/usr/lib/*.a
/usr/lib/*.la
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libxml++-2.8.pc
rpmbuild errors:
RPM build errors:
File not found: /var/tmp/libxml++-root/usr/include/libxml++-2.8
File not found: /var/tmp/libxml++-root/usr/lib/pkgconfig/libxml++-2.8.pc
At first I thought s/2.8/2.10/ in the specfile would work, but the
makefile using 2.6 makes me want to ask what's going on.
Guidance?
You sent this to the libsigc++ list instead of the libxml++ list. I do
that sometimes too.
The library is called libxml++-2.6. The latest version of libxml++-2.6
is 2.10.
A patch to the .spec file would be welcome. I doubt many people use it.
As usual, I'd recommend removing it if it remains broken, in favour of
people using their distro packages anyway.
--
Murray Cumming
murrayc murrayc com
www.murrayc.com
www.openismus.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]