=?ISO-8859-1?Q?Re=3A=20=27Re=3A=20=5Bxml=5D=20=22w3c=20xml=20schema=3A=20test=20schema=20po1=5F0=2Exsd=20might=20be=20invalid=22=27?=
- From: Kasimier Buchcik <kbuchcik 4commerce de>
- To: <veillard redhat com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: 'Re: [xml] "w3c xml schema: test schema po1_0.xsd might be invalid"'
- Date: Mon, 10 May 2004 15:56:59 +0200
Hi,
on 5/10/2004 10:30 AM Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Hi,
on 5/7/2004 8:17 PM Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Fri, May 07, 2004 at 06:10:55PM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
Is this xsd schema invalid? Any comments?
It seems that at this spoint you have a better understanding of the
XSD spec than I do. Various approaches are possibles:
- ask on the schemas list at W3C
- try with other validators like xerces, MS or XSV
- try to find examples in the existing XSD test suites covering this.
Until we have a formal definition of the XSD structure spec, trying
to decypher it to get a definitive answer seems a bit doomed, at least
the other approaches may lead to interoperability with other schemas tools.
Surprisingly I stumbled over an example schema of the XML Schema primer
(http://www.w3.org/TR/xmlschema-0/) with the name po1.xsd (!).
[...]
So I hope this is enough evidence for the error in the po1.xsd test file.
Additionally there's a mailing list thread on this subject:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/xmlschema-dev/2001Aug/0033.html
Kasimier
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]