Re: [xml] [Repost] Backwards compatibility and memory management...
- From: Tristan Van Berkom <vantr touchtunes com>
- To: veillard redhat com
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] [Repost] Backwards compatibility and memory management...
- Date: Tue, 16 Mar 2004 12:04:39 -0500
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Tue, Mar 16, 2004 at 10:16:56AM -0500, Tristan Van Berkom wrote:
[snip]
Daniel > You may get a warning at runtime if glade is using a
Daniel > deprecated function. Otherwise it should still work.
Thanks,
I built libxml 2.6.7 this morning and ran some apps,
didn't complain ;-)
Ron > xmlFree(doc) <- Doc is a doc pointer.. xmlFree clears your
Ron > xml pointers, structures, etc.
Ok, I saw "xmlDocFree()" in the API reference for tree.h, but thankyou
for pointing me to "xmlFree()" (which I deduce from your mail is what
I should use) ;-D
But I am still confused about xmlNodeListGetString(), the example
code (doc/example.html) hasn't changed and is quite unclear about
who is responsable for the returned memory location.
Am I correct to assume that "xmlNodeListGetString()" will always
allocate a new string in memory that can safely be freed with "free()" ?
(because this is what the example seems to assume, just seems strange to me)
or does it return a pointer to a private buffer that must be copied
if the user whishes to keep this buffer after xmlFree(doc) ?
Cheers all,
-Tristan
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]