Re: [xml] Namespace declaration parent, doc: also broken?

From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
To: Anthony Carrico <acarrico memebeam org>
Cc: "William M. Brack" <wbrack mmm com hk>, libxml <xml gnome org>
Subject: Re: [xml] Namespace declaration parent, doc: also broken?
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 13:18:06 -0500

On Mon, Feb 09, 2004 at 01:15:43PM -0500, Anthony Carrico wrote:

  So in any case adding a parent link instead of a document link sounds
far more generic, no ?


Sure, if you ever revisit the architecture, a parent link would be
fine, since the document link is only one step away through the parent
element. The other nodes have both, so I only mentioned both for that
reason.


  Okay, can you log this in bugzilla ? 

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/

Follow-Ups:
- Re: [xml] Namespace declaration parent, doc: also broken?
  - From: Anthony Carrico

References:
- [xml] Namespace declaration serialization
  - From: Anthony Carrico
- Re: [xml] Namespace declaration parent, doc: also broken?
  - From: Anthony Carrico
- Re: [xml] Namespace declaration parent, doc: also broken?
  - From: William M. Brack
- Re: [xml] Namespace declaration parent, doc: also broken?
  - From: Anthony Carrico
- Re: [xml] Namespace declaration parent, doc: also broken?
  - From: Daniel Veillard
- Re: [xml] Namespace declaration parent, doc: also broken?
  - From: Anthony Carrico

[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]