[xml] Re: 'RE: [xml] Initialization"'

[Kasimier Buchcik <kbuchcik 4commerce de>]

Hi,

on 4/28/2004 1:47 PM Ohad Oded wrote:

> Hi, 
> Now I'm experiencing problem in the following sequence (I'm using
> WIN32):
> Thread A calls xmlInitParser().
> .
> .
> .
> Thread A calls xmlCleanupParser().
> .
> .
> .
> Thread B calls xmlInitParser()
>
> The code of xmlInitParser() from thread B crashes, I think it has to do
> with the fact that it's not the same thread that initially called
> xmlInitParser() (thread A). It crashes in __xmlGenericError within
> IS_MAIN_THREAD and the problem is that run_once_init was not set back to
> 0 in xmlCleanupParser() (I'm not sure if intentionally or not).

As said before: "xmlCleanupParser" is intended to be called only once at 
finalization time of the library, not in-between. Put your call of 
"xmlCleanupParser" outside your thread mechanism, i.e. into the main thread.

> on 4/28/2004 9:44 AM Ohad Oded wrote:
>
>
> > Hi, 
> >
> >
> >
> > I'm experiencing an access violation.
> >
> > When working with xmlParseFile() everything is ok.
> >
> > However when working with xmlReaderForMemory() I have an access
> > violation because xmlInitParser() wasn't called.
> >
> > Is this intentional (meaning I have to call it myself)? 
>
>
> Yes, "xmlInitParser" needs to be called to initialize the library; this 
> function is reentrant, so don't care how often you call it. Some libxml2
>
> functions call "xmlInitParser", so you were just lucky in the case of 
> "xmlParseFile". Note that it initializes the library only, it is not 
> designated to be called before parsing (its name is a bit misleading). 
> Additionally, "xmlCleanupParser" needs to be called to finalize the
> library.
>
>
> Regards,
>
> Kasimier

Kasimier