Re: [xml] Curious Segmentation Fault
- From: Anthony Carrico <acarrico memebeam org>
- To: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- Cc: libxml <xml gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xml] Curious Segmentation Fault
- Date: Mon, 5 Apr 2004 13:33:56 -0400
On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 11:49:39AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
Again, the main unit of memory allocation in libxml2 is the
document.
Suppose a subroutine returns a node enveloped in a temporary document
(instead of returning an unlinked node). Is it legal to move the node
into a different destination document?
import libxml2
tmp = libxml2.newDoc("1.0")
element = tmp.newChild(None, "test", None)
doc = libxml2.newDoc("1.0")
element.unlinkNode()
doc.addChild(element)
tmp.freeDoc()
doc.freeDoc()
This seems to work fine, but from your statement I have a nagging
suspicion this might be illegal. The unlinkNode() doc says, "unlink a
node from it's current context, the node is not freed". I can't find
information about where it is legal to relink.
It would be a blow to modularity if the only possibility were to
recursively copying the node into the destination document.
Thank you so much for your patience.
--
Anthony Carrico
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]