Re: [xml] Curious Segmentation Fault

[Anthony Carrico <acarrico memebeam org>]

On Mon, Apr 05, 2004 at 03:14:54AM -0400, Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 04, 2004 at 11:33:05PM -0400, Anthony Carrico wrote:
> > Why?
>
>   Because after element.unlinkNode(), the element still references
> the document, and element.unlinkNode() checks it to find if the
> strings from the element came from the document dictionary.
> If you free the document after any element which references it you
> don't have the problem. Allocation granularity in libxml2 is
> at the document level.

So the third example (which seems to succed) is also illegal. Correct?
This one:

> > import libxml2
> > libxml2.debugMemory(1)
> > doc = libxml2.newDoc("1.0")
> > element = doc.newChild(None, "test", None)
> > element.unlinkNode()
> > doc.freeDoc()
> > doc = libxml2.newDoc("1.0")
> > doc.addChild(element)
> > element.unlinkNode()
> > element.freeNode()
> > doc.freeDoc()

-- 
Anthony Carrico