Re: [xml] xmlDoc or xmlNode
- From: "WebShark" <webshark ono com>
- To: <xml gnome org>
- Subject: Re: [xml] xmlDoc or xmlNode
- Date: Mon, 29 Sep 2003 10:52:24 +0200
----- Original Message -----
From: <aliban gmx net>
To: <xml gnome org>
Sent: Sunday, September 28, 2003 9:57 PM
Subject: [xml] xmlDoc or xmlNode
hello list.
i have some kind of benchmark question.
for my app i need to parse many little xml nodes...
in case i get a buffer filled with an xml "node" i have to build a
tree and then analyse it... i can parse the buffer with
xmlDocPtr ptxmlDocPtr;
ptxmlDocPtr = xmlParseMemory(ptchData, iSize);
xmlFreeDoc(ptxmlDocPtr);
whatever this would happen quite many times...
therefor i thought it might be less waste of cpu by not creating a
doc eacht time but instead to create/delete a node of a general doc
with the buffer.
Is it less cpu consuming to create/delete a node each time or does it
make no difference?
how to parse a buffer directly in a node? i would need a function
node xmlParseMemoryToParent(doc, parent, ptchData, iSize);
does it exist?
sorry for asking,
ed
================================
http://www.actunia.com
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]