AW: WG: AW: [xml] xmlwriter - the next step

["Mickautsch, Alfred" <alfred mickautsch schuler-ag com>]

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard redhat com]
...
> I think the next step for the xmlWriter, like for the xmlWalker will
> be to add support to generate a tree or a subtree using this API.
> Just too many people are confused by the basic tree operations.
Yes, you are right.
What do you think, would something like xmlNewTextWriterDoc for a
document tree and xmlNewTextWriterTree for a subtree do or should
there be just one function, which checks the node type and sets the
behavior automagically? Besides: is there any difference at all or
am I just inventing one? :-)

Servus -- Alfred