Re: "Re: [xml] Something better than _private?"

On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 04:27:57PM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
I have an additional question concerning this issue:
We use the xmlDoc's _private field in some cases; since it works fine I 
assume that the xmlDoc's _private field is not touched by 
transformations. Daniel, is this correct? Will it be save to use this 
field on the xmlDoc if transforming?

  That's right libxslt won't touch it.


Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit | Rpmfind RPM search engine

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]