Re: "Re: [xml] Something better than _private?"
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Kasimier Buchcik <kbuchcik 4commerce de>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: "Re: [xml] Something better than _private?"
- Date: Fri, 17 Oct 2003 10:38:26 -0400
On Fri, Oct 17, 2003 at 04:27:57PM +0200, Kasimier Buchcik wrote:
I have an additional question concerning this issue:
We use the xmlDoc's _private field in some cases; since it works fine I
assume that the xmlDoc's _private field is not touched by
transformations. Daniel, is this correct? Will it be save to use this
field on the xmlDoc if transforming?
That's right libxslt won't touch it.
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]
