Re: RE: [xml] Makefile, configure.js and DSP comments

[<oliverst online de>]

I could provide patches for the MSVC project files and maybe the BCB
ones. I am not that expericened with makefiles, so I guess you better
take care of it. It's not that bad for me, if the changes don't make it
into 2.60., because I use a custom project file for my compile. But for
other ppl out there relying on the configure.js or the project files,
that come with it it would be quite nice to fix it. I will take a look
at it later today or this week.

Jesse Pelton <jsp PKC com> schrieb am 16.10.2003, 14:29:16:
> Oliver, would you be willing to provide patches for some or all of this?  I
> don't use the MSVC IDE, so I can't address the .dsp issues.  I can deal with
> configure.js, but not for a few days, so any changes I make won't make it
> into 2.6.0 if it goes out this weekend.
>
> Daniel, do the makefile.am and makefile.in changes fall into your domain?
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Daniel Veillard [mailto:veillard redhat com] 
> > Sent: Thursday, October 16, 2003 5:15 AM
> > To: oliverst online de
> > Cc: xml gnome org
> > Subject: Re: [xml] Makefile, configure.js and DSP comments
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Oct 16, 2003 at 11:04:01AM +0200, oliverst online de wrote:
> > > - DocBook should removed from the configure.js
> > > - in the configure.js an additional kind of static build 
> > should be added
> > > ("dll" using LIBXML_STATIC_FOR_DLL)
> > > - it seems like the LIBXML_STATIC define is missing in the 
> > dsp coming
> > > with the libxml2 for the static compile
> > > - in the Makefile.am andMakefile.in in the start folder and 
> > the MSVC,
> > > BCB and VMS project files the "DOCBparser.c" is still 
> > present (mostly
> > > associated with WITH_TRIO_SOURCES)
> >
> >   Someone provide patches ! I won't mess with the win32 subdir since
> > I have absolutely no way to test any of the changes I would make.
> >
> > Daniel