Re: [xml] htmlParseFile vs htmlParseDoc

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Wed, Oct 15, 2003 at 03:35:27PM -0700, Jerome Pesenti wrote:
> There seems to be a big performance hit (x4 to x10)
> when using htmlParseDoc instead of htmlParseFile on
> big files.
>
> Interestingly, in 2.5.8 there was the same kind of 
> problem when parsing XML, but it seems to be fixed in
> 2.5.11.
>
> Any idea what's going on?

  Hum, I think it was about some buffer copies as the 
input was consumed when the buffer was initialized with a very
large input. Can you still see this with the CVS version ?

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/