Re: [xml] RAW && NXT with strncmp()
- From: Bjorn Reese <breese mail1 stofanet dk>
- To: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] RAW && NXT with strncmp()
- Date: 01 Oct 2003 18:47:31 +0200
On Wed, 2003-10-01 at 15:50, Daniel Veillard wrote:
That I was looking at it this yesterday actually but I don't feel
that confident about such a change, yet ...
The libc string functions tend to be highly optimized.
Time for informal benchmarking...
[breese stellifer:/home/breese/junk] gcc --version | head -1
gcc (GCC) 3.2.2 20030222 (Red Hat Linux 3.2.2-5)
[breese stellifer:/home/breese/junk] uname -a
Linux stellifer 2.4.20-8 #1 Thu Mar 13 17:54:28 EST 2003 i686 i686 i386
GNU/Linux
[breese stellifer:/home/breese/junk] cat compare.c
#include <string.h>
int main(void)
{
int i;
int z;
char buffer[64] = "xmlns";
for (i = 0; i < 1000000000; ++i) {
#if USE_STRNCMP
if (strncmp(buffer, "xmlns", sizeof(buffer)) == 0)
z = 1;
#else
if (buffer[0] == 'x' && buffer[1] == 'm' &&
buffer[2] == 'l' && buffer[3] == 'n' &&
buffer[4] == 's')
z = 1;
#endif
}
return 0;
}
[breese stellifer:/home/breese/junk] gcc -O2 compare.c
[breese stellifer:/home/breese/junk] time ./a.out
4.560u 0.040s 0:04.85 94.8% 0+0k 0+0io 65pf+0w
[breese stellifer:/home/breese/junk] gcc -DUSE_STRNCMP -O2 compare.c
[breese stellifer:/home/breese/junk] time ./a.out
0.930u 0.000s 0:01.03 90.2% 0+0k 0+0io 66pf+0w
I get roughly the same results if I change the content of 'buffer'.
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]