Re: [xml] Re: [Bug 126351] Changed - Entity resolution failed

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Fri, Nov 07, 2003 at 09:44:50AM +0100, Karl Eichwalder wrote:
> Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com> writes:
>
> > What I pointed to is IMHO very clear:
> >   http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-xml#NT-TextDecl
> > ---------------------
> >   4.3.1 The Text Declaration
> >
> >   External parsed entities should each begin with a text declaration.
> >   Text Declaration
> >   [77]    TextDecl    ::=    '<?xml' VersionInfo? EncodingDecl S? '?>'
> > ---------------------
>
> Problem: "should" is not defined in "1.2 Terminology".

  The production rule is normative, it is a fatal error, believe me !

> > My conclusion is right, you must add the encoding declaration in the
> > included entities (or drop the TextDecl altogether if using UTF-8,
>
> Okay, that's define in [78] - I did'nt read the REC carefully enough.

  Sorry for letting this go through. I'm pretty sure I did implement
that check a couple of years ago, but it somewhat disapeared, I don't 
know why :-\

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/