Re: [xml] xpcom wrapper for libxml (libxslt, libexslt)

[roger day globalgraphics com]

I'm all for it. I've been put off from using mozilla for my projects by the
things you mention.

It would also be good if the extensibility functionality of XSLT were to be
implemented as well.

One of the perenial questions that I've seen in newsgroups concerning
mozilla XSLT is the translation of XML into XUL. I've never understood why
XUL documents have a non-unicode format, or precisely what the problem is
there. The transformix thing seems very dense. This is probably not a topic
you could pursue in this forum.


Roger.

At 15/05/2003 11:29:54, Dmitry Belous <dmitry_belous ua fm> wrote:
#    Hi, All
#
#    I develop web application and use xml-xslt technology.
#  And I am confronted by difficulties to use xslt
#  transformation on different web-browsers (especially
#  Netscape). Although Netscape have built in support of
#  xslt transformation (transformiix) but it contain
#  bugs and not include extensions (exslt). Therefore idea
#  appear to create XPCOM component to implement functions
#  from libxml, libxslt, libexslt.
#    Project COMlibxml make a reality of this idea:
#  http://comlibxml.mozdev.org/
#    At the present moment in project include functions
#  for xslt transformation only.
#
#      What do you think about this
#    project (useful/useless/any idea)?
#
#    Dmitry
#
#  _______________________________________________
#  xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
#  xml gnome org
#  http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml
#