Re: Re[2]: [xml] [PATCH] Patch for https(ssl) support

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Fri, Jul 18, 2003 at 06:24:06PM +0400, Àëåêñåé Èâàíîâ wrote:
> DV> that's basically what I stated when Mark Vadoc proposed his implementation
> DV> last year (BTW his code seems to work both on Windows crypto and OpenSSL
> DV> if I remember correctly).
>
> Mark Vadoc has offered implementation only based on Windows crypto API. OpenSSL
> is not supported.

  Hum, right, it's Igor who did the OpenSSL one
  http://mail.gnome.org/archives/xml/2002-May/msg00138.html

> DV> Now if there general agreement that the support should be added in libxml2
> DV> source, I would not block the consensus (but I may keep it configured off
> DV> by default at least in my builds). In that case I assume Mark have been
> DV> maintaining and running his own patch for a bit more than a year and that
> DV> one might be a good candidate for integration.
>
> DV>   Do we want to reopen this issue ?
>
> IMHO the question of support https in libxml is actual and if question only in
> change of implementation with usage existing API I can finish a patch. I agree
> that by default support libxml should be excluded. Should I to finish a patch
> or we'll stop on Mark Vadoc's implementation?

  Hum, if you, Igor and Marc are all 3 interested in getting it in,
that having it disabled by default if fine for you, and you agree on a 
common patch, then I would apply it, unless there is strong disagreement
from other interested parties.

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/