[xml] Re: [xslt] Xalan vs libxslt report

On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:36:15PM -0000, spinmar interfree it wrote:

 Hi to you ....

 [nice tests omitted]

Well these are my opinions:

- Libxslt is much more robust (break is always 0.00).
- Libxslt is faster than Xalan: as the queries grow, the responce time difference is relevant.
I suppose that my choice will be libxslt.

Any suggestions?

Well, just to second your experiences: we use a libxml2/libxslt based
Apache module to transform all content in realtime for a major german
newspaper's website (www.zeit.de) and so far had no problems with
stability or performance (and we _do_ have some traffic, if i might
say so ;-) Performance is so good that i never even bothered switching 
of the debugging options.
BIG kuddos to Daniel!

  Ralf Mattes




Salve, il messaggio che hai ricevuto
 stato inviato per mezzo del sistema
di web mail interfree. Se anche tu vuoi 
una casella di posta free visita il
sito http://club.interfree.it
Ti aspettiamo!


xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
xslt gnome org

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]