[xml] Re: [xslt] Xalan vs libxslt report



On Wed, Jan 15, 2003 at 12:36:15PM -0000, spinmar interfree it wrote:

Hi,
 Hi to you ....

 [nice tests omitted]
 


Well these are my opinions:

- Libxslt is much more robust (break is always 0.00).
- Libxslt is faster than Xalan: as the queries grow, the responce time difference is relevant.
I suppose that my choice will be libxslt.
1 

Any suggestions?

Well, just to second your experiences: we use a libxml2/libxslt based
Apache module to transform all content in realtime for a major german
newspaper's website (www.zeit.de) and so far had no problems with
stability or performance (and we _do_ have some traffic, if i might
say so ;-) Performance is so good that i never even bothered switching 
of the debugging options.
BIG kuddos to Daniel!

  Ralf Mattes


Bye

--Marco 

-----------------------------------------------------

Salve, il messaggio che hai ricevuto
 stato inviato per mezzo del sistema
di web mail interfree. Se anche tu vuoi 
una casella di posta free visita il
sito http://club.interfree.it
Ti aspettiamo!

-----------------------------------------------------


_______________________________________________
xslt mailing list, project page http://xmlsoft.org/XSLT/
xslt gnome org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xslt



[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]