[xml] Xalan vs libxslt report
- From: spinmar interfree it ()
- To: xml gnome org
- Cc: xslt gnome org
- Subject: [xml] Xalan vs libxslt report
- Date: 15 Jan 2003 12:36:15 -0000
Hi,
these are the results of my first test comparing Apache Xalan Trasformer Vs Libxslt.
I have written an apache module which uses libxml2 for building a XML file and then
it trasforms it with a xslt trasformer engine. The two choices for xlst trasformer engine are:
Apache xalan and libxslt.
System configuration:
- Machine = HP Netserver
- Cpu:
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 8
model name : Pentium III (Coppermine)
stepping : 6
cpu MHz : 866.757
cache size : 256 KB
- Os = Linux version 2.4.2-2 (gcc version 2.96 20000731 (Red Hat Linux 7.1 2.96-79))
- Ram = 1 GB
- Libxml2: 2.4.30
- Libxslt: 1.0.23
- Xerces 2.1.0
- Xalan 1.4.0
- Apache 1.3.27
I have made 50, 90, 140, 185 queries in 1 minute.
These are the result
Xalan:
<------ AVG TASK CALCULATION ------>
tot ok break AVG %break
--- -- ----- --- ------
50 48 2 0.853 0.04
90 89 1 0.854 0.01
140 137 3 1.469 0.02
185 182 3 1.853 0.02
Libxslt
<------ AVG TASK CALCULATION ------>
tot ok break AVG %break
--- -- ----- --- ------
50 50 0 0.549 0.00
90 90 0 0.629 0.00
140 140 0 0.770 0.00
185 185 0 0.845 0.00
Well these are my opinions:
- Libxslt is much more robust (break is always 0.00).
- Libxslt is faster than Xalan: as the queries grow, the responce time difference is relevant.
I suppose that my choice will be libxslt.
Any suggestions?
Bye
--Marco
-----------------------------------------------------
Salve, il messaggio che hai ricevuto
è stato inviato per mezzo del sistema
di web mail interfree. Se anche tu vuoi
una casella di posta free visita il
sito http://club.interfree.it
Ti aspettiamo!
-----------------------------------------------------
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]