Re: [xml] xml bug?
- From: Morus Walter <morus walter tanto-xipolis de>
- To: "Grosmann, Ruud" <r grosmann sdu nl>, xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] xml bug?
- Date: Wed, 12 Feb 2003 15:29:30 +0100
Hi,
I am currently using xmllint (libxml version 20422) to parse XML
documents. Until recently I was very content with its trustability. But
I came across someting that seems to be a bug of xmllint. I am not sure
if this is the right place to report it. If it is not, I want to
apologize and ask wher I should report it then.
If you're sure, that it's a bug, you can file it (with minimal but
complete samples) in bugzilla. See the web page for details.
However you should also check, that the bug occurs in recent versions.
I don't remember in which version, but Daniel changed the validation
code completely (now using the regex engine written for xml schema).
If I construct a sample from your info, I don't see a problem with
2.5.3:
cat x.xml
<!DOCTYPE backm [
<!ELEMENT backm (nawerk, inhopg? , (tekstpl | (bijlage |
notatoe)+)? , voetnoot*) >
<!ELEMENT nawerk EMPTY>
<!ELEMENT inhopg EMPTY>
<!ELEMENT tekstpl EMPTY>
<!ELEMENT bijlage EMPTY>
<!ELEMENT notatoe EMPTY>
<!ELEMENT voetnoot EMPTY>
]>
<backm><nawerk/><notatoe/><bijlage/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/><voetnoot/>
</backm>
xmllint --noout --valid x.xml
So I suggest you update to 2.5.3.
HTH
Morus
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]