Re: [xml] validation discrepency

[Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>]

On Mon, Dec 01, 2003 at 08:14:29AM -0800, T A wrote:
> Hi,
>  
> I have been working with the libxml coding examples, parser2.c and reader2.c and I am seeing a discrepency 
> in the DTD validations. I have an XML file and corresponding DTD that are validated by xmllint and the 
> parser2 test program but not validated by reader2. 
> What is the difference between 
> The calls to xmlCtxtReadFile like so 
>  
> doc = xmlCtxtReadFile(ctxt, filename, NULL, XML_PARSE_DTDVALID);
>  
> in parser2 and the call to xmlReaderForFile
>  
> reader = xmlReaderForFile(filename, NULL,
>                  XML_PARSE_DTDATTR |  /* default DTD attributes */
> XML_PARSE_NOENT |    /* substitute entities */
> XML_PARSE_DTDVALID); /* validate with the DTD */
>  
> in reader2? Where is the error?

  within xmlreader.c code. The XML_PARSE_DTDVALID option should have 
forced a validation flag in the ctxt but didn't. The difference isn't
between those 2 calls but somewhere else in the initializations done by
xmllint when using --valid. This is fixed in CVS, in the meantime add
  xmlTextReaderSetParserProp(reader, XML_PARSER_VALIDATE, 1);
to force the setup of the flag in the reader.

   thanks for the report,

Daniel

-- 
Daniel Veillard      | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com  | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit  http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/