Re: [xml] GHashTable as replacement of built-in xmlHashTable
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: Kang Jeong-Hee <Keizi mail co kr>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] GHashTable as replacement of built-in xmlHashTable
- Date: Sun, 13 Apr 2003 11:21:32 -0400
On Sun, Apr 13, 2003 at 07:52:56PM +0900, Kang Jeong-Hee wrote:
GLib 2 provide a hash table; GHashTable.
Its APIs are nearly equivalent to ones of xmlHashTable.
not surprizing, considering objects like hash table, having
similar APIs for similar objects is normal.
I propose GHashTable as replacement of xmlHashTable
and removing hash.[ch] from libxml2.
Suggesting to change code without reasons is a bit childish.
Why not suggesting glib to use hash.[ch] from libxml2 instead ?
libxml2 does not depends on glib. glib doesn't depend on libxml2,
there is a bit of code duplication, but where is the problem ?
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]