Re: [xml] Resolution on the WinCE patch

[Javier <ppcquicksoft iespana es>]

All,

If anybody objects against, I will take over the wince io module. As soon 
as I can spare some time to it I´ll implement and test it within my 
environment.

Javier

At 16:19 17/09/2002 +0200, you wrote:
> > P.S.: BTW what is the resolution on the WinCE patch of libxml2 ?
>
> To that, I thought that someone who has access to WinCE and cares about
> doing it should implement a separate module which would provide the missing
> IO functions, read, write, open and close. For the beginning, read could be
> implemented so it calls fread internally, open calls fopen and so on, if the
> full IO based on the native API means too much work. That would give the
> same functionality the patch offered and would be a lot cleaner.
>
> If such module does not arrive, I would, well, forget it (sorry, Javier).
> Putting those #ifdeffed lines in the source, so at least something is there,
> means that the mess remains there forever, as noone would care about
> implementing the module then. But, that is my opinion.
>
> Regarding the WinCE makefiles, these are totally clean as they are. However,
> these would need modification to accomodate the new module, should it be
> made. If we would put them somewhere under win32 subdirectory now, they
> would lurk around useless, unless the source patch were applied.
>
> I would gladly do the module, but I have neither access to a WinCE device
> for testing, nor to the emulation environment for development, but I would
> not object on someone providing me these :-) :-)
>
> Ciao
> Igor
>
> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list, project page  http://xmlsoft.org/
> xml gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml


______________________________________________________________________________
mensaje enviado desde http://www.iespana.es
emails (pop)-paginas web (espacio ilimitado)-agenda-favoritos (bookmarks)-foros -Chat