Re: [xml] periods legal in an NMTOKEN
- From: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- To: David Cramer <dcramer broadjump com>
- Cc: xslt gnome org, xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] periods legal in an NMTOKEN
- Date: Tue, 10 Sep 2002 17:28:55 -0400
On Tue, Sep 10, 2002 at 01:24:18PM -0500, David Cramer wrote:
We have a dtd with attributes defined as NMTOKEN. When the attribute
values have periods in them, we get the error:
"validity error: standalone: foo on bar value had to be normalized based
on external subset declaration"
Our processing system is designed to die on the word error (some other
xsl processors aren't so nice with their exit codes). If I change
NMTOKEN to CDATA in the DTD, we no longer get the error but that causes
other problems.
Looking at the spec, I think periods should be ok in an NMTOKEN:
http://www.w3c.org/TR/2000/REC-xml-20001006#NT-Nmtoken
Right, give me a sample test case according to
http://xmlsoft.org/bugs.html
Then I will look into it,
thanks,
Daniel
--
Daniel Veillard | Red Hat Network https://rhn.redhat.com/
veillard redhat com | libxml GNOME XML XSLT toolkit http://xmlsoft.org/
http://veillard.com/ | Rpmfind RPM search engine http://rpmfind.net/
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]