Re: [xml] XML-Signature
- From: Aleksey Sanin <aleksey aleksey com>
- To: veillard redhat com
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re: [xml] XML-Signature
- Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2002 13:09:47 -0800
Yep, will do. I used Purify for testing and it showed nothing.
I'll try this tool too. Thanks for the hint!
Aleksey.
Daniel Veillard wrote:
On Sun, Mar 17, 2002 at 01:36:17AM -0800, Aleksey Sanin wrote:
It turns out that the task of implementing XMLDSig was actually
much less difficult than I expected (thanks to Daniel for nice XML library!)
I finished testing and I think I am ready to do a first release. Please
check
it out if you are interested:
http://www.aleksey.com/xmlsec/
Excellent !!! I didn't yet integrated your last patch will do today.
I will add links from xmlsoft.org . I could also mirror your download
area on xmlsoft.org/rpmfind.net if you provide me ftp or rsync access.
It compiled fine here, the code looks clean though I didn't do an
intensive review and adding
-pedantic -W -Wunused -Wimplicit -Wreturn-type -Wswitch -Wcomment -Wtrigraphs -Wformat -Wchar-subscripts -Wuninitialized -Wparentheses -Wshadow -Wpointer-arith -Wcast-align -Wwrite-strings -Waggregate-return -Wstrict-prototypes -Wmissing-prototypes -Wnested-externs -Winline -Wredundant-decls
to the CFLAGS spotted a few things to clean up ;-)
I also suggest you run some of your tests with valgrind as I did recently
it proved really efficient in spotting illegal memory accesses:
http://devel-home.kde.org/~sewardj/
D
aniel
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]