Re: [xml] libxml2 and schema validation

[Steve Williams <swilliams rinax com>]

Hi,

What would it take to implement the "include" syntax??  I would consider 
having a go at this if it was not to complicated (I am an experienced C 
programmer).  I have a need for it, and can't imagine it being too hard 
to implement.  But when I think about it, I am sure there are some 
complications or Danial would have done it already...

Thanks,
Steve Williams
Rinax Computer Systems.

Daniel Veillard wrote:

> On Wed, Dec 04, 2002 at 10:22:08AM +0100, Bohlig, Elisabeth wrote:
>  
>
> > Hello,
> >
> > I'm working with libxml for a long time and now I'm waiting for full support of schema validation. Even with 
> > the latest version (2.4.28) there are many TODOs left (include, simple content,...).
> > I don't know how it works with the development of open source code:
> > Is there any time frame for finishing implementation?
> >    
>
>  No, it's finished when it's done. Since there is no resource allocated
> it all depends on the various people interested on getting it finished
> to actually provide the code, the test cases, etc...
>
>  
>
> > Is there someone (except Danial Veillard) who is responsible for this part of code? 
> >    
>
>  Hum, Charles Bozeman helped on them.
> My take is that I currently have no use of XML Schemas. I implemented most
> of the framework, and said "I welcome help, patches and bug reports".
> When I get precise bug report or missing functionalities which are needed,
> then I try to implement them. But it's not my #1 priority, and I appreciate
> getting patches... or complete reports. And the Schemas TODO is not maintained
> i.e. I did not look at it or modify it in a long time.
>
> Daniel
>
>