Re: [xml] Pasting fragment

[chrisbee xml swing be]

> On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 03:50:37PM +0200, chrisbee xml swing be wrote: 
> > > On Thu, Aug 22, 2002 at 01:41:52PM +0200, chrisbee xml swing be wrote: 
> > > looks okay a priori. But I really can't understand why you don't 
> > > want to pass node->doc to xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory() , to later 
> > > update it everywhere in the resulting nodes ... This makes absolutely no 
> > > sense to me ! 
> > Because I do some tests before and calling xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory() 
> > initialized doc->children with the result node llist. But it seems that 
> this happens only if doc->children is NULL (Is this a bug ?). At this 
> 
> I don't see in the code how this could happen. It doesn't touch 
> doc->children ! 
Yes, it does !
Here is the Call Stack ...
5. startElement()
4. xmlParseStartTag()
3. xmlParseElement()
2. xmlParseContent()
1. xmlParseBalancedChunkMemory()
and the lines that modify children
    if (ctxt->myDoc->children == NULL) {
#ifdef DEBUG_SAX_TREE
 xmlGenericError(xmlGenericErrorContext, "Setting %s as root\\n", name);
#endif
        xmlAddChild((xmlNodePtr) ctxt->myDoc, (xmlNodePtr) ret);