Re: [xml] Questions about libxml as a DLL on win32.

[Steven M Cherry <smc cherrys org>]

Perfect! :-)

I changed /MT to /MD and it works as you say.  I'll figure out how this
maps over to the borland world and post results here.

Thanks a lot,

Steven

> -----Original Message-----
> > Well, then I guess we can't agree on this.  Here's a makefile for
> > MSVC that shows the same results as the makefile for borland.
>
> get ready to agree
>
> > Makefile.msvc
> > -------------
> > #
> > # This is the unix build version of the makefile for SolitanLib
> > ###############################################################
>
> > CC=cl.exe
> > OHEXT=obj
>
> > CFLAGS=/W3 /MT /O2 /GX /D "WIN32" /D "NDEBUG" \
> >     /D "_WINDOWS" /D "_MBCS" /D "_USRDLL" \
> >     /FD
> > LFLAGS=
>
> You are compiling main.c and dllfunctions.c and staticly linking both to the
> c runtime.  this means that each there is a free() function in testdll.exe
> and dllfunctions.dll.  that is the cause of your problem.
>
> change the /MT compiler flag to /MD.
>
> Or, for more proof, use add the following line to both main.c and
> dllfunctions.c
>
> printf("I am using free 0x%08X\n",free)
>
> you will see that testdll.exe is using a different copy of free as
> dllfunctions.c,  that is your problem.
>
> It is not a win32 "dll boundary" issue.
>
> _______________________________________________
> xml mailing list
> xml gnome org
> http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/xml

-- 
==================================================================
== Steven M. Cherry                            smc cherrys org  ==
==                 http://family.cherrys.org/steven/index.html  ==
==================================================================