Re: [xml] SIGFPE + small bug

[Bjorn Reese <breese mail1 stofanet dk>]

Daniel Veillard wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:38:22PM +0200, robert wrote:

> > I just noticed another problem: the code in xmlXPathDivideBy() also checks
> > for SIGFPE and SIG_IGN definitions, but since HAVE_SIGNAL_H is never
> > defined anywhere, signal.h is not included and SIGFPE/SIG_IGN don't get
> > defined as well.
> >
> > Perhaps a check for signal.h should be included?
>
>   I'm really surprized, I was sure that the availability of signal() and
> signal.h were checked from configure, and they were not there.

I will suggest the opposite approach. <signal.h> and signal() are part
of ANSI C, so they will be available for all compilers out there (ok,
not K&R compilers, but do these actually exists anymore?). Therefore,
there is no need for HAVE_SIGNAL / HAVE_SIGNAL_H.