Re: [xml] SIGFPE + small bug

Daniel Veillard wrote:

On Thu, Jun 07, 2001 at 04:38:22PM +0200, robert wrote:

I just noticed another problem: the code in xmlXPathDivideBy() also checks
for SIGFPE and SIG_IGN definitions, but since HAVE_SIGNAL_H is never
defined anywhere, signal.h is not included and SIGFPE/SIG_IGN don't get
defined as well.

Perhaps a check for signal.h should be included?

  I'm really surprized, I was sure that the availability of signal() and
signal.h were checked from configure, and they were not there.

I will suggest the opposite approach. <signal.h> and signal() are part
of ANSI C, so they will be available for all compilers out there (ok,
not K&R compilers, but do these actually exists anymore?). Therefore,
there is no need for HAVE_SIGNAL / HAVE_SIGNAL_H.

[Date Prev][Date Next]   [Thread Prev][Thread Next]   [Thread Index] [Date Index] [Author Index]