Re[4]: [xml] xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefault problems
- From: Gabriel Ambuehl <gabriel_ambuehl buz ch>
- To: Daniel Veillard <veillard redhat com>
- Cc: xml gnome org
- Subject: Re[4]: [xml] xmlSubstituteEntitiesDefault problems
- Date: Mon, 31 Dec 2001 13:54:13 +0100
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hello Daniel,
31 Dec 2001, 12:46:42, you wrote:
Not very sensible from an XML point of view. That's not possible
with libxml. How would you know whether the original string was
some text <
or
some text <lt;
I can't see why there should be any doubt that it was the first one
since if you don't substitute the entities then the string is simply
the same as in the file?
for further processing and that probably would be rather slow.
"would" or how to break design by applying too early perceived
optimization hints.
Try it, profile it and come back with hard data showing why it's
really needed, if needed :-)
Uhm well I don't care enough for the performance of my administration
UI (which is where I'd need that feature) to start profiling it so
I'll probably just live with the additional subroutine calls...
Best regards,
Gabriel
^
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: PGP 6.5i
iQEVAwUBPDBR6cZa2WpymlDxAQHCzggAqr9FCFQpF79XJXb8ASTUwxUMVAFa3pAY
BvYY1Dm5k/OgumKKN/WMML1sr1tVfv+OVwbNe+hEiTR5x2bSJXWUekZqWlUKdlwi
sFV5KjdrzOUv5vPP5/4WvdhFoSHBQ3rNgnRahLhOZvWpEqH7MBG3whznJsyDr8y+
pPO0/vTQWDs/HYOr7By5L5D9nogSpzzylFFfSeSNErBnwIZsF3arNU9VijIkIOMm
5pO0yWC0zUl0gqdEebHgqZwJhrXVT5+30yenjspplu+fcnujizbq3sU97+pw+DgW
ChaBIlKeUArnk/+QK53SWsm9F6+xfGBVF9Nc9F4jQY8cSeby6NUMkA==
=GYbZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]