Re: Lots of _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN issues ...
- From: Billy Biggs <vektor dumbterm net>
- To: Havoc Pennington <hp redhat com>
- Cc: Iban HATCHONDO <hatchond yahoo fr>, Gerd Knorr <kraxel bytesex org>, wm-spec-list gnome org, keithp keithp com
- Subject: Re: Lots of _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN issues ...
- Date: Thu, 29 May 2003 15:57:23 -0500
Havoc Pennington (hp redhat com):
> On Thu, May 29, 2003 at 03:09:54PM -0500, Billy Biggs wrote:
> > But what about when the mouse hits the edge of the window, the X
> > server will pan?
>
> Some apps certainly avoid this; how do they do it? Presumably vidmode
> has some "do not pan" mode? Can't you enable that?
Oh, looks like I can.
XF86VidModeLockModeSwitch
Neat. :)
Maybe WMs should do that when a fullscreen window is active?
> > Aside: I seriously thought that _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN meant that
> > my app didn't need to worry about all of our VidMode code. :(
>
> You shouldn't need to worry about resizing or redecorating your
> application window (once we sort all this out), but you still have to
> worry about changing the X server to the vidmode you want including
> any properties of that such as whether it should allow panning.
>
> Fullscreen mode does not imply changing vidmode - how would the WM
> know which vidmode to change to?
No, it should honour the current vidmode. The user will use
ctrl-alt-+/- or xrandr or whatever to select the appropriate refresh
rate or resolution, and then using _NET_WM_STATE_FULLSCREEN should use
the current mode, no?
-Billy
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]