Re: [Xpert]Re: User-level Tasks in Hotplug Scripts?
- From: 520047054719-0001 t-online de (Oliver Neukum)
- To: David Brownell <david-b pacbell net>, Christer Palm <palm nogui se>
- Cc: Vladimir Dergachev <volodya mindspring com>, Jim Gettys <jg pa dec com>, Ryan Shaw <ryan shaw stanfordalumni org>, linux-hotplug-devel lists sourceforge net, wm-spec-list gnome org, xpert XFree86 Org
- Subject: Re: [Xpert]Re: User-level Tasks in Hotplug Scripts?
- Date: Tue, 5 Feb 2002 09:56:03 +0100
On Tuesday 05 February 2002 02:54, David Brownell wrote:
> > >>Jim, if the user is logged in so is the rest of the user interface. Why
> > >>not have a monitoring program (like console) that watches the hotplug
> > >>events and invokes corresponding configuration program ?
>
> Actually one of the goals of the hotplug framework is to avoid
> requirements to have Yet Another Monitoring Daemon hanging
> around wasting resources ... likewise, to avoid needing to start the
> apropriate magic program before plugging in devices.
You could have the demon started by inetd.
[..]
> > And what would the problem be with using an event distribution mechanism
> > that would require the listener to have certain privileges?
>
> Another of the goals classic end-user "usability". Remember that
> the original problem was how to fire up an unprivileged tool ... not
> all hotplug events imply any need for privilege. Users initiate hotplug
> events with just physical access privileges. When the device software
> has already been set up, additional privilege shouldn't be needed.
Not all users are equal in this regard. Eg. a FibreChannel network might
be quite extensive.
Regards
Oliver
[
Date Prev][
Date Next] [
Thread Prev][
Thread Next]
[
Thread Index]
[
Date Index]
[
Author Index]